"Hua Zhong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Correction: it's TSO, not TOE.
>
> By googling I found that specifying a big MTU (like 16500) on the "tc class"
> command avoids the "giant" packets. No idea where they come from.
They come from TCP because it will pass down a max MTU sized packet
(upto
"Hua Zhong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just add more info: this machine has TOE. And if that's turned off,
> everything seems to work fine.
>
> Does it mean that traffic control doesn't play well with TOE? Or there are
> some tricks to make them work together?
Congratulations. You discovered
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:30 PM
> To: 'netdev@vger.kernel.org'
> Subject: RE: Linux 2.6 HTB does only work with existing connections
>
> Just add more info: this machine has TOE. And if that's turned off,
> everything seems to work fin
n't matter much.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hua Zhong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:45 PM
> To: 'netdev@vger.kernel.org'
> Subject: Linux 2.6 HTB does only work with existing connections
>
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to u
Hi all,
I tried to use HTB on a 2.6.12 based kernel. It seems that if I issue the tc
commands, existing connections adjust bandwidth immediately, but any new
connections won't be filtered correctly.
The tc version is 3.17.
The commands are very simple (only eth1 is active):
tc qdisc del dev
