Benjamin Thery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> A couple of random thoughts in trying to understand the numbers you are
>> seeing.
>>
>> - Checksum offloading?
>>
>> You have noted that with the bridge netfilter support disabled you
>> are still seeing additional chec
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
as suggested Rick, I added the Service Demand results to the matrix.
A couple of random thoughts in trying to understand the numbers you are
seeing.
- Checksum offloading?
You have noted that with the bridge netfilte
Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> as suggested Rick, I added the Service Demand results to the matrix.
A couple of random thoughts in trying to understand the numbers you are
seeing.
- Checksum offloading?
You have noted that with the bridge netfilter support disabled you
Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> as suggested Rick, I added the Service Demand results to the matrix.
Thanks. The latency number is interesting and it confirms what we were
seeing looking at cpu usage.
We don't have an inexpesive way to get a packet from the outside world
t
Hi,
as suggested Rick, I added the Service Demand results to the matrix.
Cheers.
Hi,
I did some benchmarking on the existing L2 network namespaces.
These patches are included in the lxc patchset at:
http://lxc.sourceforge.net/patches/2.6.20
The lxc7 patchset series conta
