On Friday 05 February 2016 19:11:06 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 February 2016 18:25:08 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > @@ -1173,7 +1189,8 @@ static int netcp_tx_submit_skb(struct netcp_intf
> > *netcp,
> > }
> >
> > set_words(
On 02/03/2016 03:13 PM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
> On 2/3/2016 10:47 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 02/03/2016 12:08 PM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
>>> On 2/3/2016 8:35 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> [..]
>
It would be nice to give this a go once the network driver problem
is solved.
>>>
hi Arnd,
On 02/05/2016 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 04 February 2016 18:25:08 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>
>>> I have another version for testing below. That removes the logic that
>>> splits and reassembles the 64-bit values, but leaves the other changes
>>> in place. Can you try
On Thursday 04 February 2016 18:25:08 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >
> > I have another version for testing below. That removes the logic that
> > splits and reassembles the 64-bit values, but leaves the other changes
> > in place. Can you try this?
> >
>
> Nop. It crashes kernel
Ah. too bad.
>
On 02/04/2016 03:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 04 February 2016 14:19:54 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 02/03/2016 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 18:31:00 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 02/03/2016 06:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 F
On 02/03/2016 06:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
So only making this change on the latest master with no
oth
On Thursday 04 February 2016 14:19:54 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 February 2016 18:31:00 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >> On 02/03/2016 06:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
Hi Arnd,
On 02/03/2016 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 18:31:00 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 02/03/2016 06:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 11:41:40 Murali Karicheri wrote:
> >
> > This looks wrong: I was getting the build warnings originally
> > because of 64-bit dma_addr_t, and that should be the only way that
> > this driver can operate, because in some configurations on keystone
> > there is no memory
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 18:31:00 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 06:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >> On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> >>> On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> >
On 2/3/2016 10:47 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
On 02/03/2016 12:08 PM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
On 2/3/2016 8:35 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[..]
It would be nice to give this a go once the network driver problem
is solved.
Big endian kernel has worked on Keystone in past.
Yes, this was on a
On 02/03/2016 12:08 PM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
> On 2/3/2016 8:35 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 19:19:13 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2016 05:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:59:34 Franklin Cooper wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 03:
On 2/3/2016 8:35 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 19:19:13 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
On 02/02/2016 05:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:59:34 Franklin Cooper wrote:
On 02/02/2016 03:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 15:01:3
On 02/03/2016 11:31 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 06:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>
> So only
On 02/03/2016 11:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
So only making this change on the latest master with no
oth
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 19:19:13 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 05:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:59:34 Franklin Cooper wrote:
> >> On 02/02/2016 03:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 15:01:33 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
On 02/03/2016 06:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
So only making this change on the latest master with no
other changes I see t
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> > On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> >>>
> >> So only making this change on the latest master with no
> >> other changes I see the boot problem again.
>
> ye
On 02/03/2016 08:21 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>> On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2016 05:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:59:34 Franklin Cooper wrote:
> On 0
Hi Arnd,
On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>
>> On 02/02/2016 05:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:59:34 Franklin Cooper wrote:
On 02/02/2016 03:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday
On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
> On 02/02/2016 05:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:59:34 Franklin Cooper wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2016 03:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 15:01:33 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> Yes. He
On 02/02/2016 05:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:59:34 Franklin Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/02/2016 03:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 15:01:33 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
Yes. Here is a boot log on the latest master with the below
th
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:59:34 Franklin Cooper wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 03:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 February 2016 15:01:33 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes. Here is a boot log on the latest master with the below
> >> three patches reverted.
> >> http://pastebin.co
On 02/02/2016 03:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 15:01:33 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>
>> Yes. Here is a boot log on the latest master with the below
>> three patches reverted.
>> http://pastebin.com/W7RWSHpE (Working)
>>
>> I reverted these three patches. The two lates
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 15:01:33 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
> Yes. Here is a boot log on the latest master with the below
> three patches reverted.
> http://pastebin.com/W7RWSHpE (Working)
>
> I reverted these three patches. The two latest patches seem
> to be trying to correct/expand upo
On 02/02/2016 02:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 10:50:41 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>> Latest mainline is currently failing to boot for Keystone 2
>> Hawking but I'm assuming its true for other Keystone 2
>> boards. Bisect shows that this issue popped up after the
>>
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 10:50:41 Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> Latest mainline is currently failing to boot for Keystone 2
> Hawking but I'm assuming its true for other Keystone 2
> boards. Bisect shows that this issue popped up after the
> patch "netcp: try to reduce type confusion in descrip
Hi All,
Latest mainline is currently failing to boot for Keystone 2
Hawking but I'm assuming its true for other Keystone 2
boards. Bisect shows that this issue popped up after the
patch "netcp: try to reduce type confusion in descriptors"
(commit 89907779) was introduced. There was another patch
"
28 matches
Mail list logo