Hi Chris,
here are some steps to narrow it down.
1. try the latest kernel first (2.6.16.16). This BUG should be fixed there.
2. try without grsecurity patch
3. if it still persists:
Please provide more information about your setup before
submitting a bug.
lspci -vvv and
On 16 May 2006, at 11:51, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:38:38AM +0100, Chris Boot
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
May 16 09:15:12 baldrick kernel: [6442250.504000] KERNEL:
assertion (!
sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at net/core/stream.c (283)
May 16 09:15:12 baldrick ker
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:38:38AM +0100, Chris Boot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> May 16 09:15:12 baldrick kernel: [6442250.504000] KERNEL: assertion (!
> sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at net/core/stream.c (283)
> May 16 09:15:12 baldrick kernel: [6442250.513000] KERNEL: assert
. It looks like these bugs are related
to e1000, which is the driver I'm using. The system was running 24
days before these appeared and it's still running absolutely fine.
May 16 09:15:12 baldrick kernel: [6442250.504000] KERNEL: assertion (!
sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at net/core
is missing from 2.6.14.X is
fb5f5e6e0cebd574be737334671d1aa8f170d5f3
This patch is in the linux-2.6.14 stable tree, I just
verified this.
So it must be another problem: I had this message with 2.6.15.2:
KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at net/core/stream.c (279)
KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_
From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:10:21 -0800
> I think the commit id that is missing from 2.6.14.X is
> fb5f5e6e0cebd574be737334671d1aa8f170d5f3
It's in 2.6.14.x I just double checked.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the
From: Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:37:48 +1300
> On 2/10/06, Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, Ian McDonald.
> >
> > On 09.02.2006 22:25 you said the following:
> >
> > > Is it possible for you to download 2.6.16-rc2 or similar and see if it
> > >
stem running 2.6.14.5. It's been
up for 50 days, quite heavily loaded, and I've seen this only once.
Should i be conserned ? Could someone tell me what it means ?
# uname -a
Linux mail 2.6.14.5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 27 14:39:55 CET 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
# dmesg|grep KERNEL
KERNEL: asser
On 2/10/06, Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Ian McDonald.
>
> On 09.02.2006 22:25 you said the following:
>
> > Is it possible for you to download 2.6.16-rc2 or similar and see if it
> > goes away?
>
> It'll be better, if I get only patch fixs that problem, not all 2.6.16-rc2.
Hello, Ian McDonald.
On 09.02.2006 22:25 you said the following:
Is it possible for you to download 2.6.16-rc2 or similar and see if it
goes away?
It'll be better, if I get only patch fixs that problem, not all 2.6.16-rc2.
--
Boris B. Zhmurov
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"wget http://kernelpani
On 2/10/06, Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Jesse Brandeburg.
>
> On 08.02.2006 23:07 you said the following:
>
> > whats the relevance of e1000?
> >
> > I though Herbert had fixed these
>
> Nope :( I had this messages on 2.6.14.2 and now I have it on 2.6.15.3.
>
For what it's
Hello, Jesse Brandeburg.
On 08.02.2006 23:07 you said the following:
whats the relevance of e1000?
I though Herbert had fixed these
Nope :( I had this messages on 2.6.14.2 and now I have it on 2.6.15.3.
--
Boris B. Zhmurov
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"wget http://kernelpanic.ru/bb_public_key
On 2/8/06, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:07:14 -0800
>
> > this should be on netdev (cc'd), i included some of the thread here.
> ...
> > I though Herbert had fixed these, and it looks like half the patches
> > go
From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:07:14 -0800
> this should be on netdev (cc'd), i included some of the thread here.
...
> I though Herbert had fixed these, and it looks like half the patches
> got into 2.6.14.3, but not the fix to the fix committed on 9-6 (not i
nux 2.6.14.3 #1 SMP Fri Nov 25 20:20:05 SGT 2005 i686 GNU/Linux from 2.4,
>
> I am getting the warning log:
>
> kernel: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at
> net/core/stream.c (279)
> kernel: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at
> net/ipv4/af_
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:11:51 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5946] New: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc)
failed at net/core/stream.c (279)
h
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:11:51 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5946] New: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc)
failed at net/core/stream.c (279)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5946
Summ
t; >Nov 27 22:56:20 king kernel: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc)
> >failed at net/core/stream.c (279)
> >Nov 27 22:56:20 king kernel: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc)
> >failed at net/ipv4/af_inet.c (151)
> >
> >All I could find r
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 04:39:23 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5591] New: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc)
failed at net/core/stream.c (279)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5591
Summ
--- Begin Message ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5591
Summary: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at
net/core/stream.c (279)
Kernel Version: 2.6.14
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Owner: [EM
20 matches
Mail list logo
