Please backport 63b46242f707849 [was: Issue with LACP mode in linux bonding driver]

2015-07-02 Thread Jonathan Toppins
Please back port the following to the LTS trees v3.2, v3.4, v3.10, v3.12, v3.14, and v3.18 commit 63b46242f707849a1df10b70e026281bfa40e849 Author: Wilson Kok Date: Mon Jan 26 01:16:59 2015 -0500 bonding: fix incorrect lacp mux state when agg not active Sending this to verify the above p

Re: Issue with LACP mode in linux bonding driver

2015-06-26 Thread Ajith Adapa
Hi, Thanks for the Update. I agree with Jonathon and this change has to be picked by the stable release. Configuration like this might end up creating huge duplication of frames for end nodes. Regards, Ajith On 27 June 2015 at 05:27, Jonathan Toppins wrote: > On 6/26/15 5:19 PM, Jay Vosburgh

Re: Issue with LACP mode in linux bonding driver

2015-06-26 Thread Jonathan Toppins
On 6/26/15 5:19 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Ajith Adapa wrote: On 26 June 2015 at 07:45, Jay Vosburgh wrote: echo 'module bonding =p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control Hi, thanks for the reply. I tried this out a bit here, and could reproduce the problem on 3.13, but not on 4

Re: Issue with LACP mode in linux bonding driver

2015-06-26 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Ajith Adapa wrote: >On 26 June 2015 at 07:45, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >> echo 'module bonding =p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control >Hi, > >thanks for the reply. I tried this out a bit here, and could reproduce the problem on 3.13, but not on 4.0.0. A bit of checking suggests that

Re: Issue with LACP mode in linux bonding driver

2015-06-26 Thread Ajith Adapa
On 26 June 2015 at 07:45, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > echo 'module bonding =p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control Hi, thanks for the reply. Linux server (enp0s8)(bond0) (po1)(xe1) switch Linux server (enp0s9)(bond0) (po2)(xe2) switch I have tried the steps mentioned in the pr

Re: Issue with LACP mode in linux bonding driver

2015-06-25 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Ajith Adapa wrote: >Hi, > >Sorry for direct mail. Since the question is more specific about >supporting LACP standard I decided to communicate directly with the >MAINTAINERS. My issue is related to multiaggregation support in LACP. I saw your message this morning, but didn't have an oppo