On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 09:49:42AM -0800, John Bowler wrote:
> >The click-through license establishes the same ol' terms. "You can
> >only distribute this software with a hardware product."
>
> This probably isn't a good place to discuss the license, particularly
> as I'm certainly not a lawyer,
I removed l-a-k from the response list as I have been previously told
that even mentioning this software is inappropriate for the list...
From: Marc Singer
>> On Dec 21 2005, at 15:48, Stefan Roese was caught saying:
>> > It most likely is the same code. Currently it's version 2.0.
It's currentl
