Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

2006-02-24 Thread David S. Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:22:25 +0900 (JST) > Here it is. I think net-2.6 is fine. Thanks. Applied, thanks a lot. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

2006-02-24 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Hello. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:10:18 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:23:51 +0900 (JST) > > > David, please apply. Thank you. > > Can you please resend the patch w

Re: (usagi-users 03614) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

2006-02-23 Thread David S. Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:23:51 +0900 (JST) > David, please apply. Thank you. Can you please resend the patch with a full changelog entry and Signed-off-by lines for me? Thank you. This is for net-2.6 right? Or net-2.6.17? Thanks again. - To unsubs

Re: (usagi-users 03611) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

2006-02-19 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:54:13 +0100), [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: > Yes, Hugo Santos suggested me to use the minimum of both, the new > patch is available there : > > http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patch2 Do you mean like this? Signed-off-

Re: (usagi-users 03610) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

2006-02-19 Thread hoerdt
Yes, Hugo Santos suggested me to use the minimum of both, the new patch is available there : http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patch2 Thanks, Hoerdt Mickaël On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:13:44PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

2006-02-19 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:09 +0100), [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: > The fix is very simple, it only grab the value of frag_size and > use it in ip6_fragment file, could you please review the patch which > fix that problem at : > > http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/i

IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

2006-02-19 Thread hoerdt
Hi, In my precedent mails, i pointed out that IPV6_MTU setsockopt was ineffective because the field frag_size was not used further in the ipv6 fragment code of the kernel. You can check out that this is the case by this simple proof of concept code : http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/mtu.c Th