From: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:14:06 +0900
> Here's the result with just the async job changeset reverted.
>
> http://testlab.linux-ipv6.org/tahi-autorun.2/ct-v6logo2-host_net-2.6.16-20051227_without_async-job-patch/nd.p2/
>
> The fails occured at the same tes
Hi,
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2005/12/27 18:11:59:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:08:26 +0900 (JST)
>
> > Chinen-san has run tests against current net-2.6.16 tree.
> > We could run tests (Phase-1 for Host, Phase-2 Core for Host),
>
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:08:26 +0900 (JST)
> Chinen-san has run tests against current net-2.6.16 tree.
> We could run tests (Phase-1 for Host, Phase-2 Core for Host),
> we see some regression in IPv6 neighbor discovery.
> We have not tracked down closel
Hello.
Chinen-san has run tests against current net-2.6.16 tree.
We could run tests (Phase-1 for Host, Phase-2 Core for Host),
we see some regression in IPv6 neighbor discovery.
We have not tracked down closely yet.
FYI, you can find the result (IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-2 Core
(Host)) at:
http://t
