It works! I applied the patch to
linux-2.6.17 + patch-2.6.17-rc1
and tried icmp, tcp and udp as well as sftp with
ipsec and they all worked.
Thanks
Regards,
Joy
>Herbert Xu writes:
>
>> Interesting. We were previously off by 28 bytes, now we're off by 8 :)
>
>You missed a couple of 'beql
Herbert Xu writes:
> BTW, did you see the "cmpldi r1,..." stuff in the code? That's a typo,
> right?
Yes it is a typo, but fixing it is lower priority since both r1 and
cr1 equal 1.
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
Hi Paul:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:22:07PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> You missed a couple of 'beqlr' instructions (branch if equal to LR).
> I'd be interested to know if it still fails with the patch below.
Yes that'd do it.
BTW, did you see the "cmpldi r1,..." stuff in the code? That's
Herbert Xu writes:
> Interesting. We were previously off by 28 bytes, now we're off by 8 :)
You missed a couple of 'beqlr' instructions (branch if equal to LR).
I'd be interested to know if it still fails with the patch below.
Thanks,
Paul.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S b/arch/powe
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:36:26AM -0500, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> I tried the patch on the following:
> linux-2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc1
>
> The good news is that the pings worked great!
> So perhaps ESP is working ok with ICMP.
>
> But when I tried to do sftp, I still got the oops.
> I don't think
Joy Latten writes:
> The good news is that the pings worked great!
> So perhaps ESP is working ok with ICMP.
>
> But when I tried to do sftp, I still got the oops.
> I don't think TCP and ESP are working.
You're hitting the BUG_ON(len) at line 611 of net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c.
Is that the same thing
>--
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S
>index fd66acf..9e8d9e7 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S
>@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include
>
> .align 7
> _GLOBAL(memcpy)
>+ std r3,-8(r1)
> mtcrf 0x01,r5
Hi:
Thanks to some excellent info from Joy, I've trakced the problem down to
a broken implementation of memmove on ppc64, which in turn is due to a
broken memcpy.
Both memmove and memcpy need to return the destination pointer as per
the C standard. The ppc64 version of memcpy returns a pointer t
>> I can try patch-2.6.18-rc1, etc... to see which one it stops
>> working on to narrow it down.
>
>If you could do this in the meanwhile, it would help us out
>a lot.
>
It stops working in patch-2.6.18-rc1.
Regards,
Joy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the b
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:25:15PM -0500, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> A straight 2.6.17 kernel does not crash and my pings work.
> A 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 does crash and my pings do not work.
> The above tests were done on a ppc64.
Thanks for that info. This does sound like a bug.
Could you plea
From: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:25:15 -0500
> I can try patch-2.6.18-rc1, etc... to see which one it stops
> working on to narrow it down.
If you could do this in the meanwhile, it would help us out
a lot.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
>Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2
>> onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured
>> IPSec using the configuration listed below.
>
>Could you try straight 2.6.17? If that crashes too, then at least we
>can be sure that
Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2
> onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured
> IPSec using the configuration listed below.
Could you try straight 2.6.17? If that crashes too, then at least we
can be sure that it isn
From: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:15:57 -0400 (EDT)
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> > I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2
> > onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured
> > IPSec using the configuration listed below
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Joy Latten wrote:
> I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2
> onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured
> IPSec using the configuration listed below.
Confirming that this does not crash on i686 or x86_64.
- james
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL
I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2
onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured
IPSec using the configuration listed below.
A ping from one machine to the other, hangs.
No packets leave the machine issuing the ping.
When I tried sftp, I received following oop
16 matches
Mail list logo
