After thinking about that, i can say only thanks.
I like your idea, and it is better to avoid mistakes and missed traffic, then
have a lot of complaints from users "why my shaper not working well". And
seems i will try to switch to HFSC.
Thanks for explanation.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:55:31 +010
Denys wrote:
Additionally, it doesn't show rate in stats (so it is difficult to measure,
how much is really using each class).
qdisc hfsc 1: root default 200
Sent 1392761062 bytes 965768 pkt (dropped 52, overlimits 1620539 requeues 0)
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
Thats what rate
Denys wrote:
Hi All
During testing i found very strange thing.
After applying even example shaper:
http://linux-ip.net/tc/hfsc.en/
-
[...]
---
I had all traffic on eth0 stopped. Tried on br0 - same result. Even ARP
becoming non-functional.
After specifying correct de
Additionally, it doesn't show rate in stats (so it is difficult to measure,
how much is really using each class).
qdisc hfsc 1: root default 200
Sent 1392761062 bytes 965768 pkt (dropped 52, overlimits 1620539 requeues 0)
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc bfifo 200: parent 1:200 lim
Hi All
During testing i found very strange thing.
After applying even example shaper:
http://linux-ip.net/tc/hfsc.en/
-
# Example from Figure 1.
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: hfsc
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc sc rate
1000kbit ul
