Fwd: I/OAT performance data

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Leech
should have kept this on list -- Forwarded message -- From: Chris Leech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mar 16, 2006 11:13 AM Subject: Re: I/OAT performance data To: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I must be missing something - if the MTU was 1500 bytes, how did the > receiver's offlo

Fwd: I/OAT performance data

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Leech
oops, should have kept this on list -- Forwarded message -- From: Chris Leech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mar 16, 2006 10:56 AM Subject: Re: I/OAT performance data To: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > When it says "buffer size" for the Chariot stuff, is that the socket > buffer siz