async poll(), etc.
>
>It's a new bullshit standard from the crackmonkeyes at the opengroups
>interconnect working group that already tried to push idiocies like RNICPI
>onto us. I already told them that they're on crack but they don't care.
>It's never going to
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:51:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >Ugh...
> >So people can find the ways to connect kernelspace event queue and
> >asynchronous networking operations with object-oriented design patterns?
>
> >It's time to me to have a step forward from stone
>Ugh...
>So people can find the ways to connect kernelspace event queue and
>asynchronous networking operations with object-oriented design patterns?
>It's time to me to have a step forward from stone age...
yep ;-).
>Could you please provide a link, it would be nice to read this
discussion.
H
See the links below.
On 3/14/06, Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, while commercial Unix vendors create rocket-science-capable API,
> > > Linux just implements the core.
> > Your patches have been recently discussed on ACE mail list
> > regarding future support of linux kern
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:48:41PM +0200, Robert Iakobashvili ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Evgeniy,
>
>
> >There are some stuff already implemented and presented in netdev@,
> > unfortunately it did not get much attention and feedback.
> >
> > Queue of events used for socket operations:
> > http
Evgeniy,
>There are some stuff already implemented and presented in netdev@,
> unfortunately it did not get much attention and feedback.
>
> Queue of events used for socket operations:
> http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projects&item=kevent
> http://lwn.net/Articles/171317/
> http://ma
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:25:08PM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm hearing noise about the 'Extended Sockets' API in Oracle. It's an
> extension to the socket API put together by an industry group that calls
> itself the Interconnect Software Consortium and is working in
> partnership
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:25:08PM -0800, Zach Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi guys,
Hello Zach.
> I'm hearing noise about the 'Extended Sockets' API in Oracle. It's an
> extension to the socket API put together by an industry group that calls
> itself the Interconnect Software Consortium
> Also, the following scares me:
>
> This specification has not been verified for avoidance of possible
> third-party proprietary rights. In implementing this specification,
> usual procedures to ensure the respect of possible third-party
> intellectual property rights should be followed.
Scary,
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:25:08 -0800
Zach Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm hearing noise about the 'Extended Sockets' API in Oracle. It's an
> extension to the socket API put together by an industry group that calls
> itself the Interconnect Software Consortium and is working in
> Yes, this is how these standard groups try to force a particular
> approach to high speed networking down everyone's throats.
Yeah, from what I understand there's a lot of RDMA/IB people involved in
that ``ICSC'' thing.
> I think we'll pass on this stuff.
OK, so noted. Thanks.
- z
-
To unsu
From: Zach Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:25:08 -0800
> The API adds support for things like memory registration, async
> operations completed through event queues, "standard" sendfile() and
> async poll(), etc.
Yes, this is how these standard groups try to force a particular
Hi guys,
I'm hearing noise about the 'Extended Sockets' API in Oracle. It's an
extension to the socket API put together by an industry group that calls
itself the Interconnect Software Consortium and is working in
partnership with the open group. The API adds support for things like
memory regis
13 matches
Mail list logo
