Re: Blogpost evaluation this [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP

2017-04-25 Thread David Miller
From: Andy Gospodarek Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:25:49 -0400 > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:26:43PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> Andy, how goes it? :) > > Sorry for the delayed response. I was AFK yesterday, but based on > testing from Friday and what I wrapped up today all looks good to me. > >

Re: Blogpost evaluation this [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP

2017-04-25 Thread Andy Gospodarek
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:26:43PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer > Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:24:05 +0200 > > > I've done a very detailed evaluation of this patch, and I've created a > > blogpost like report here: > > > > > > https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/e

Re: Blogpost evaluation this [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP

2017-04-25 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:26:43 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer > Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:24:05 +0200 > > > I've done a very detailed evaluation of this patch, and I've created a > > blogpost like report here: > > > > > > https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/

Re: Blogpost evaluation this [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP

2017-04-24 Thread David Miller
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:24:05 +0200 > I've done a very detailed evaluation of this patch, and I've created a > blogpost like report here: > > > https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/blogposts/xdp25_eval_generic_xdp_tx.html Thanks for doing this Jespe

Blogpost evaluation this [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP

2017-04-24 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
I've done a very detailed evaluation of this patch, and I've created a blogpost like report here: https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/blogposts/xdp25_eval_generic_xdp_tx.html I didn't evaluate the adjust_head part, so I hope Andy is still planning to validate that part? --Jesper