Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems that because ipcomp_alloc_tfms() calls smp_processor_id(),
> but a comment says not need locking. Is this right?
Yes the comment is right. I'll fix it up.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV
Hello,
It seems that because ipcomp_alloc_tfms() calls smp_processor_id(),
but a comment says not need locking. Is this right?
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code: ipcomp/2801
caller is ipcomp_init_state+0x170/0x490
Call Trace:{debug_smp_processor_id+182