Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: ipcomp/2801

2005-08-17 Thread Herbert Xu
Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems that because ipcomp_alloc_tfms() calls smp_processor_id(), > but a comment says not need locking. Is this right? Yes the comment is right. I'll fix it up. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV

BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: ipcomp/2801

2005-08-17 Thread Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA
Hello, It seems that because ipcomp_alloc_tfms() calls smp_processor_id(), but a comment says not need locking. Is this right? BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code: ipcomp/2801 caller is ipcomp_init_state+0x170/0x490 Call Trace:{debug_smp_processor_id+182