Hi,
I am contacting you with regards to using your last name for funds claim of
long dormant funds belonging to a late depositor . Let me know if you are
interested for more details .
Best Regards
David Lin
You are a recipient to Mrs Julie Leach Donation of $3 million USD.
Contact(julieleac...@gmail.com) for claims.
You are a recipient to Mrs Julie Leach Donation of $3 million USD.
Contact(julieleac...@gmail.com) for claims.
You are a recipient to Mrs Julie Leach Donation of $2 million USD. Contact
(julieleach...@gmail.com) for claims
Dear friend,
I need your help for Transferring(US$4.5M DOLLARS)to your Bank Account.
Reply Me back lets proceed also send the below requirement so i can
reply you with more details so i can advice you on how to apply to the
Bank for the transfer.
1)Full names.
2)country of origin.
3)Your Mobi
though we're
> allowing practically unlimited handling of Tx completions].
> Given these facts, what's the benefit of having arbitrary large
> Rx buffer rings? Assuming quota is 64, I would have expected
> that having more than twice or thrice as many buffers could not
> he
;> NAPI is being scheduled from soft-interrupt contex, and it
> >>> has a ~strict quota for handling Rx packets [even though we're
> >>> allowing practically unlimited handling of Tx completions].
> >>> Given these facts, what's the benefit of havin
t quota for handling Rx packets [even though we're
>>> allowing practically unlimited handling of Tx completions].
>>> Given these facts, what's the benefit of having arbitrary large
>>> Rx buffer rings? Assuming quota is 64, I would have expected
>>> th
allowing practically unlimited handling of Tx completions].
>> Given these facts, what's the benefit of having arbitrary large
>> Rx buffer rings? Assuming quota is 64, I would have expected
>> that having more than twice or thrice as many buffers could not
>> help in real traffi
packets [even though we're
> allowing practically unlimited handling of Tx completions].
> Given these facts, what's the benefit of having arbitrary large
> Rx buffer rings? Assuming quota is 64, I would have expected
> that having more than twice or thrice as many buffers cou
ns].
Given these facts, what's the benefit of having arbitrary large
Rx buffer rings? Assuming quota is 64, I would have expected
that having more than twice or thrice as many buffers could not
help in real traffic scenarios - in any given time-unit
[the time between 2 NAPI runs which shoul
De-inline functions to benefit from compiler smartness
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: John Ronciak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 30 +++---
1
12 matches
Mail list logo
