On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Wei Sun wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> we find a special case for Linux TCP undo operations where
> tp->snd_cwnd could be extremely large (e.g., 4294967294) by two
> consecutive cwnd undo operations when using
> reno/veno/vegas/highspeed/HTCP/yeah/westwood/hybla/illinoi
Hi there,
we find a special case for Linux TCP undo operations where
tp->snd_cwnd could be extremely large (e.g., 4294967294) by two
consecutive cwnd undo operations when using
reno/veno/vegas/highspeed/HTCP/yeah/westwood/hybla/illinois/scalable/lp
congestion control algorithms in the latest long-