On Tue, 8 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> happens when a local process sends packets with invalid IP headers
> through raw sockets.
[...]
> Whatever happens, that printk should be toned down, shouldn't it? We
> prefer to not let unprivileged apps spam the logs.
Isn't "unprivileged app sendi
On 08/05/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 08 May 2007 10:35:14 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> / filesystem was full
>
> [39525.46] BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU1, eip 08056990,
registers:
> [39525.468000] Modules linked in: loop i
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Whatever happens, that printk should be toned down, shouldn't it? We
> prefer to not let unprivileged apps spam the logs.
Only priviledged apps can send these packets. I've never seen it in
practice except for one case that was a bug in the network stack, so
I'd prefer to
On Tue, 08 May 2007 10:35:14 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> / filesystem was full
>
> [39525.46] BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU1, eip 08056990,
> registers:
> [39525.468000] Modules linked in: loop ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat
> autofs4 af_packe
