On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:58:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:16:13 -0400
Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you please have a look at the attached patch
Looks like a fine patch to me, although it could benefit from a
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:58:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:16:13 -0400
> Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Can you please have a look at the attached patch
>
> Looks like a fine patch to me, although it could benefit from a comment
> explaining why all
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:16:13 -0400
Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you please have a look at the attached patch
Looks like a fine patch to me, although it could benefit from a comment
explaining why all those PAGE_ALIGN()s are in there.
> and include it in -mm.
Does it fix a pat
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:53:58AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:03:50PM -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> >>On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:11 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >>>On (06/10/06 11:36), Vivek Goyal didst pronounce:
> Where is bss pl
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:03:50PM -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:11 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On (06/10/06 11:36), Vivek Goyal didst pronounce:
Where is bss placed in physical memory? I guess bss_start and bss_stop
from System.map will
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:03:50PM -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:11 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On (06/10/06 11:36), Vivek Goyal didst pronounce:
> > > Where is bss placed in physical memory? I guess bss_start and bss_stop
> > > from System.map will tell us. That will confirm
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:11 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (06/10/06 11:36), Vivek Goyal didst pronounce:
> > Where is bss placed in physical memory? I guess bss_start and bss_stop
> > from System.map will tell us. That will confirm that above memset step is
> > stomping over bss. Then we have to ju
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 06:11:05PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (06/10/06 11:36), Vivek Goyal didst pronounce:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > Linux version 2.6.18-git22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.0 (SUSE
> > > > Linux)) #2 SMP Thu Oct 5 19:05:36
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 06:11:05PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (06/10/06 11:36), Vivek Goyal didst pronounce:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > Linux version 2.6.18-git22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.0 (SUSE
> > > > Linux)) #2 SMP Thu Oct 5 19:05:36
On (06/10/06 11:36), Vivek Goyal didst pronounce:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > Linux version 2.6.18-git22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.0 (SUSE
> > > Linux)) #2 SMP Thu Oct 5 19:05:36 PDT 2006
> > > Command line: root=/dev/sda1 vga=791
> > > ip=9.47.
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Linux version 2.6.18-git22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.0 (SUSE
> > Linux)) #2 SMP Thu Oct 5 19:05:36 PDT 2006
> > Command line: root=/dev/sda1 vga=791
> > ip=9.47.67.239:9.47.67.50:9.47.67.1:255.255.255.0 resume=/dev/sdb1 s
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:02:54 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Code: 0f 0b 48 8b 3d 15 ab 1e 00 be d0 00 00 00 e8 c0 f5 ff ff 48
> > RIP [] init_list+0x1d/0xfd
> > RSP
> > <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
> >
> >
> > I am going to revert the p
keith mannthey wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 01:35 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
As of yet I haven't been able to recreate the hang. I am running
similar HW to Steve.
I ran into this with -mm3
Memory: 24150368k/26738688k available (1933k kernel code, 490260k
reserved, 978k data, 308k in
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 01:35 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > As of yet I haven't been able to recreate the hang. I am running
> > similar HW to Steve.
I ran into this with -mm3
Memory: 24150368k/26738688k available (1933k kernel code, 490260k
reserved, 978k data, 308k init)
[ cut here ]
> As of yet I haven't been able to recreate the hang. I am running
> similar HW to Steve.
That was on a 4 core Opteron with Tyan board (S2881) and AMD-8111
chipset.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More ma
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 01:14 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 22:51, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > hmm, rather than bugging you with patches now, I'll see what I can find
> > > with the x86_64 machines I have access to and see can I reproduce it.
> >
> > I started the bisect,
On Thursday 05 October 2006 22:51, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > hmm, rather than bugging you with patches now, I'll see what I can find
> > with the x86_64 machines I have access to and see can I reproduce it.
>
> I started the bisect, should finish soon.
It ended at
diff-tree d5cdb67236dba94496de
> hmm, rather than bugging you with patches now, I'll see what I can find
> with the x86_64 machines I have access to and see can I reproduce it.
I started the bisect, should finish soon.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAI
On Thursday 05 October 2006 22:42, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 21:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > Can you please try it again with this patch to narrow it down further?
>
> Unfortunately this is as far as it got before it hung.
Boot with earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,57600
(or change t
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 21:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Can you please try it again with this patch to narrow it down further?
Unfortunately this is as far as it got before it hung.
root (hd0,0)
Filesystem type is reiserfs, partition type 0x83
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-autobench root=/dev/sda1 vga=79
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 20:52, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:27:02PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 19:57, Steve Fox wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 17:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Please don't snip the Code: line.
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 21:08 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Mel might want to take a look (and perhaps
> also cut down a little on the ugly printks ...)
I tested a patch from Mel which backs out the arch independent zone
sizing and got the same results (to my inexperienced eye). I've sent him
the boo
On Thursday 05 October 2006 20:52, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:27:02PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 October 2006 19:57, Steve Fox wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 17:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please don't snip the Code: line. It is fairly import
On Thursday 05 October 2006 20:51, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 20:27 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > I guess we need to track when it gets corrupted. Can you send the full
> > boot log with this patch applied?
>
> Here she blows!
Can you please try it again with this patch to narrow
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 20:27 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I guess we need to track when it gets corrupted. Can you send the full
> boot log with this patch applied?
Here she blows!
root (hd0,0)
Filesystem type is reiserfs, partition type 0x83
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-autobench root=/dev/sda1 vga=791
i
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:27:02PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 19:57, Steve Fox wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 17:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > Please don't snip the Code: line. It is fairly important.
> >
> > Sorry about that. The remote console I was using a
On Thursday 05 October 2006 19:57, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 17:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > Please don't snip the Code: line. It is fairly important.
>
> Sorry about that. The remote console I was using appears to overwrite
> some text after I force the reboot. Here's a clean
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 17:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Please don't snip the Code: line. It is fairly important.
Sorry about that. The remote console I was using appears to overwrite
some text after I force the reboot. Here's a clean one.
global
Unable to handle kernel NULL poin
On Thursday 05 October 2006 17:32, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 08:12 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>
> > Can you post the latest panic stack again (with CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL) ?
>
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL should be on
>
> > Last time I couldn't match your instruction dump to any code s
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 08:12 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Can you post the latest panic stack again (with CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL) ?
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL should be on
> Last time I couldn't match your instruction dump to any code segment
> in the routine. And also, can you post your .config file.
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 09:53 -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 18:08 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >>I think most likely it would crash on 2.6.18. Keith mannthey had reported
> > >>a different crash on 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 when this patch was introduced first
> > >>tim
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 18:08 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>I think most likely it would crash on 2.6.18. Keith mannthey had reported
> >>a different crash on 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 when this patch was introduced first
> >>time. Following is the link to the thread.
> >
> >
> > Then may
On 10/4/06, Martin Bligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andi Kleen wrote:
>>I think most likely it would crash on 2.6.18. Keith mannthey had reported
>>a different crash on 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 when this patch was introduced first
>>time. Following is the link to the thread.
>
>
> Then maybe trying 2.6.17
On 10/4/06, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 17:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:42:28 -0500
> Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:50:31 + (UTC)
> > >
Andi Kleen wrote:
I think most likely it would crash on 2.6.18. Keith mannthey had reported
a different crash on 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 when this patch was introduced first
time. Following is the link to the thread.
Then maybe trying 2.6.17 + the patch and then bisect between that and -rc4?
I think
> I think most likely it would crash on 2.6.18. Keith mannthey had reported
> a different crash on 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 when this patch was introduced first
> time. Following is the link to the thread.
Then maybe trying 2.6.17 + the patch and then bisect between that and -rc4?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe f
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:06:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:41:59 -0500
> Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 08:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:42:28 -0500
> > > Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Sorry
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:41:59 -0500
Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 08:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:42:28 -0500
> > Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sorry for the delay. I was finally able to perform a bisect on this. It
> > > turn
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 08:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:42:28 -0500
> Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay. I was finally able to perform a bisect on this. It
> > turns out the patch that causes this is
> > x86_64-mm-re-positioning-the-bss-segment.pa
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:45:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:42:28 -0500
> Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:50:31 + (UTC)
> > > "Steve Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 17:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:42:28 -0500
> Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:50:31 + (UTC)
> > > "Steve Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:42:28 -0500
Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:50:31 + (UTC)
> > "Steve Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:46:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:50:31 + (UTC)
> "Steve Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:46:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18/2.6.18-mm2/
> >
43 matches
Mail list logo
