On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> well, when running e1000 through some code paths on FC4 +
> 2.6.17-rc5-mm1 + ingo's latest rollup patch, with this lockdep debug
> option enabled I got this:
>
> e1000: eth1: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1
well, when running e1000 through some code paths on FC4 +
2.6.17-rc5-mm1 + ingo's latest rollup patch, with this lockdep debug
option enabled I got this:
e1000: eth1: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
==
[ BUG: bad unlock ord
Hi Arjan,
On 30/05/06, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 17:59 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30/05/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patc
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 17:59 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30/05/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc5/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/
> >
> >
>
> It looks like
Hi,
On 30/05/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc5/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/
It looks like a network stack problem.
May 30 17:50:34 ltg01-fedora init: Switching to runlevel: 6
May 30 17:50:35 ltg01-fedora avahi-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Morton napsal(a):
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc5/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/
BUG: warning at /l/latest/xxx/kernel/softirq.c:86/local_bh_disable()
[] show_trace+0x1b/0x1d
[] dump_stack+0x26/0
