On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:23:14PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 October 2006 19:20, David Kimdon wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:01:31PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:17:13 -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> > > > Continue d80211 bitfield removal. In general
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 19:20, David Kimdon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:01:31PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:17:13 -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> > > Continue d80211 bitfield removal. In general, compilers have
> > > difficulty generating efficient code for bitfiel
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:01:31PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:17:13 -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> > Continue d80211 bitfield removal. In general, compilers have
> > difficulty generating efficient code for bitfields. This patchset
> > removes all bitfields from include/net/d8
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:17:13 -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> Continue d80211 bitfield removal. In general, compilers have
> difficulty generating efficient code for bitfields. This patchset
> removes all bitfields from include/net/d80211.h.
Thanks for the patches! At first I intended to ask you to
Continue d80211 bitfield removal. In general, compilers have
difficulty generating efficient code for bitfields. This patchset
removes all bitfields from include/net/d80211.h.
I converted the 1 bit bitfields into a bit in a u32/u16 or u8 flags
structure member. Larger bitfields I converted into
