On 10/30/2020 6:59 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Cc'ing Cong, Paul, Oz and Davide.
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:22:04AM +0800, wenxu wrote:
>> Only do gso for the reassembly big packet is also can't fix all the
>> case such for icmp packet.
> Good point. And as we can't know that a fragm
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:59:36PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Cc'ing Cong, Paul, Oz and Davide.
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:22:04AM +0800, wenxu wrote:
> > Only do gso for the reassembly big packet is also can't fix all the
> > case such for icmp packet.
>
> Good point. And as we
Cc'ing Cong, Paul, Oz and Davide.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:22:04AM +0800, wenxu wrote:
> Only do gso for the reassembly big packet is also can't fix all the
> case such for icmp packet.
Good point. And as we can't know that a fragment was for an icmp
packet before defraging it, this is quite im
Hi,
Currently kernel tc subsystem can do conntrack things in cat_ct. But there is a
problem need
to fix. For several fragment packets handle in act_ct. The
tcf_ct_handle_fragments will defrag
the packets to a big one. But the after action will redirect mirror to a device
which maybe lead