Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: [RFC 3/7] NetLabel: CIPSOv4 engine

2006-06-27 Thread Klaus Weidner
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:33:57PM -0400, James Morris wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Joe Nall wrote: > > For all of the EAL4 LSPP Linux evaluation work is being done by Red > > Hat/IBM/HP/atsec and others to be useful to integrators, there has to be > > basic > > (e.g. CIPSO) multilevel network in

Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: [RFC 3/7] NetLabel: CIPSOv4 engine

2006-06-26 Thread Paul Moore
On Monday 26 June 2006 8:33 pm, James Morris wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Joe Nall wrote: > > For all of the EAL4 LSPP Linux evaluation work is being done by Red > > Hat/IBM/HP/atsec and others to be useful to integrators, there has to be > > basic (e.g. CIPSO) multilevel network interoperability

Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: [RFC 3/7] NetLabel: CIPSOv4 engine

2006-06-26 Thread James Morris
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Joe Nall wrote: > For all of the EAL4 LSPP Linux evaluation work is being done by Red > Hat/IBM/HP/atsec and others to be useful to integrators, there has to be basic > (e.g. CIPSO) multilevel network interoperability with existing multilevel > systems and good (e.g IPSec) mul

Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: [RFC 3/7] NetLabel: CIPSOv4 engine

2006-06-26 Thread Joe Nall
On Jun 22, 2006, at 4:12 AM, David Miller wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Add support for the Commercial IP Security Option (CIPSO) to the IPv4 network stack. CIPSO has become a de-facto standard for trusted/labeled networking amongst existing Trusted Ope