Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> + int (*port_init)(struct rocker_port *rocker_port, void *priv,
>>> +void *port_priv);
>>
>> Yuck, void *. Can we do better?
>
> I see nothing wrong with this priv usage. It's done like this on many
> places. I think it is completely legit, s
Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:16:29AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>
>> This is another step on the way to per-world clean cut. Introduce world
>> ops hooks which each world can implement in world-specific way.
>> Also introduce
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
>
> This is another step on the way to per-world clean cut. Introduce world
> ops hooks which each world can implement in world-specific way.
> Also introduce world infrastructure including function for port worlds
> change.
>
From: Jiri Pirko
This is another step on the way to per-world clean cut. Introduce world
ops hooks which each world can implement in world-specific way.
Also introduce world infrastructure including function for port worlds
change.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko
---
v1->v2:
- removed functions to c
