Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:38:43AM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko
>Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 23:53:53 +0100
>
>> Dave, why this was marked "Changes Requested" in patchwork?
>
>Because you gotta kill that BUG_ON() as per our discussion.
That is different patchset. I'm going to send bug
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 23:53:53 +0100
> Dave, why this was marked "Changes Requested" in patchwork?
Because you gotta kill that BUG_ON() as per our discussion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.o
Dave, why this was marked "Changes Requested" in patchwork?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Jiri Pirko
This patchset introduces needed infrastructure for link aggregation
offload - for both team and bonding. It also implements the offload
in mlxsw driver.
Particulary, this patchset introduces possibility for upper driver
(bond/team/bridge/..) to pass type-specific info down to no
