Re: [patch 5/9] secmark: Add secmark support to core networking.

2006-06-09 Thread James Morris
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, David Miller wrote: > Remember James, you're on the hook now to shrink sk_buff > when you get a chance :-) Yep, I remember. -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [patch 5/9] secmark: Add secmark support to core networking.

2006-06-09 Thread David Miller
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:20:55 -0700 > Add a secmark field to the skbuff structure, to allow security subsystems to > place security markings on network packets. This is similar to the nfmark > field, except is intended for implementing security policy, rather than than >

[patch 5/9] secmark: Add secmark support to core networking.

2006-06-08 Thread akpm
From: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add a secmark field to the skbuff structure, to allow security subsystems to place security markings on network packets. This is similar to the nfmark field, except is intended for implementing security policy, rather than than networking policy. This patc