Re: [patch 14/14] e1000: No-delay link detection at interface up

2006-12-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Arjan van de Ven wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: ACK, though you can also just schedule the timer to run immediately, or even run it yourself inside spin_lock_bh() sure but this is very simple, clean and obvious ;) Hence the ACK... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u

Re: [patch 14/14] e1000: No-delay link detection at interface up

2006-12-15 Thread Arjan van de Ven
Jeff Garzik wrote: ACK, though you can also just schedule the timer to run immediately, or even run it yourself inside spin_lock_bh() sure but this is very simple, clean and obvious ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [patch 14/14] e1000: No-delay link detection at interface up

2006-12-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Arjan van de Ven wrote: Subject: e1000: No-delay link detection at interface up From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Currently after an interface up, the link state is detected 2 seconds later when the first watchdog timer runs. This patch changes that by triggering the hardware to generat

[patch 14/14] e1000: No-delay link detection at interface up

2006-12-15 Thread Arjan van de Ven
Subject: e1000: No-delay link detection at interface up From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Currently after an interface up, the link state is detected 2 seconds later when the first watchdog timer runs. This patch changes that by triggering the hardware to generate a link-change interrupt