[patch 1/8] Update smc91x driver with ARM Versatile board info

2006-12-04 Thread akpm
From: Deepak Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We need to specify a Versatile-specific SMC_IRQ_FLAGS value or the new generic IRQ layer will complain thusly: No IRQF_TRIGGER set_type function for IRQ 25 () Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Russell

Re: [patch 1/8] Update smc91x driver with ARM Versatile board info

2006-10-20 Thread Russell King
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:42:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We need to specify a Versatile-specific SMC_IRQ_FLAGS value or the new > generic IRQ layer will complain thusly: I don't think I heard anything back from my previous suggestion that the IRQ flags are passed through the platform d

[patch 1/8] Update smc91x driver with ARM Versatile board info

2006-10-20 Thread akpm
From: Deepak Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We need to specify a Versatile-specific SMC_IRQ_FLAGS value or the new generic IRQ layer will complain thusly: No IRQF_TRIGGER set_type function for IRQ 25 () Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Russell