On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:48:13AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL
PROTECTED](B wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:54:25 +0400), Andrey
> Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED](B
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:54:25 +0400), Andrey
Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL
> PROTECTED](B wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:18:51 +0400), Andrey
> > Savochki
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL
PROTECTED](B wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:18:51 +0400), Andrey
> Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > @@ -3271,22 +3277,22 @@ int unregister_netdevice(struct net_devi
> >
> > /* And
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:18:51 +0400), Andrey
Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> @@ -3271,22 +3277,22 @@ int unregister_netdevice(struct net_devi
>
> /* And unlink it from device chain. */
> for (dp = &dev_base; (d = *dp) != NULL; dp = &d->next) {
Wh
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:35:37PM +0400, A.N.Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> > Different modules want different kinds of lookup.
> > So, I'm thinking about something like ilookup5.
>
> > The next question: would people agree to review a patch doing this for
> > net_devices? :)
>
> One not original sug
Hello!
> Different modules want different kinds of lookup.
> So, I'm thinking about something like ilookup5.
> The next question: would people agree to review a patch doing this for
> net_devices? :)
One not original suggestion, which did not sound nevertheless:
to implement netdev_iterate_l
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 10:10:03AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:24:05AM +0400, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> > > Yes, it's a little more work as you need to audit all drivers to see what
> > > they are doing and find suitable abstractions but it's a must have that
> > >
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:24:05AM +0400, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> > Yes, it's a little more work as you need to audit all drivers to see what
> > they are doing and find suitable abstractions but it's a must have that
> > should have been done a lot earlier.
>
> Hiding dev_base_head can be done
Christoph,
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 06:46:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:18:51PM +0400, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> > Cleanup of net_device list use in net_dev core and IP.
> > The cleanup consists of
> > - converting the to list_head, to make the list double-linke
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:18:51PM +0400, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> Cleanup of net_device list use in net_dev core and IP.
> The cleanup consists of
> - converting the to list_head, to make the list double-linked (thus making
>remove operation O(1)), and list walks more readable;
> - introduc
Cleanup of net_device list use in net_dev core and IP.
The cleanup consists of
- converting the to list_head, to make the list double-linked (thus making
remove operation O(1)), and list walks more readable;
- introducing of for_each_netdev wrapper over list_for_each.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Sa
11 matches
Mail list logo
