David S. Miller wrote:
From: Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:39:08 +0200
Jeff Garzik wrote:
I find them useful in my own drivers; they are definitely not pure noise.
gcc -finstrument-functions
I was going to mention this as well, and also the idea to
enable CONFI
From: Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:39:08 +0200
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > I find them useful in my own drivers; they are definitely not pure noise.
>
> gcc -finstrument-functions
I was going to mention this as well, and also the idea to
enable CONFIG_MCOUNT on a per-file
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:51:21 -0400
> >
> >>NAK. Rationale: maintainer's choice. Pavel doesn't get to choose
> >>the debugger of choice for the driver maintainer.
> >
> > If it makes the driver u
David S. Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:51:21 -0400
NAK. Rationale: maintainer's choice. Pavel doesn't get to choose
the debugger of choice for the driver maintainer.
If it makes the driver unreadable and thus harder to maintain,
I think such
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This removes debug prints from entry/exit of functions. Such level of
debugging should probably be done by gdb or similar.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "James P. Ketrenos"
