On Sun, Sep 27 2020 at 13:57, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:48:46 +0200
>
>> in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel
>> configurations:
>
> Please respin this against net-next, some of the patches in here are already
> in net-nex
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:48:46 +0200
> in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel
> configurations:
Please respin this against net-next, some of the patches in here are already
in net-next (the wireless debug macro one) and even after that the series
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 21:48 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Folks,
>
> in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel
> configurations:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266...@linutronix.de/
>
> Linus clearly requested that code in drivers and libraries which
Folks,
in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel configurations:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266...@linutronix.de/
Linus clearly requested that code in drivers and libraries which changes
behaviour based on execution context should either be split up so t
