On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:43:43PM +0200, Marcin Ślusarz wrote:
> 2007/8/10, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > (..)
> > I think, there is this one possible for your testing yet?:
> > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +020
2007/8/10, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (..)
> I think, there is this one possible for your testing yet?:
> Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
I think I already tested this patch, but this thread is sooo big and I
c
* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All correct! There was also checked a possibility it can be not hw
> itself, but wrong way of handling after hw (acking too late). This was
> false idea (or bad implementation), so it looks like hw vs lapic
> problem.
i think the problem is that
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:08:33AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 10-08-2007 10:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > ...
> > > But suppressing the resend is not fixing the driver problem. The
> > > problem can show up with spurious interrupts and wi
* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10-08-2007 10:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> ...
> > But suppressing the resend is not fixing the driver problem. The
> > problem can show up with spurious interrupts and with interrupts on
> > a shared PCI interrupt line at any time. It just migh
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:48:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Vignaud wrote:
> > ...
> > > I was still testing on -rc2:
> > > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IR
* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Vignaud wrote:
> ...
> > I was still testing on -rc2:
> > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
> >
> > For me after 1da
> For me it's enough too but Thomas seems to doubt.
>
> You've written earlier that you've 2.6.23-rc1 with HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> prepared too. So, if this is not a great problem maybe you could try
> this first. Tomorrow Thomas may send something, so this 100HZ could
> wait yet, I hope?
Ok, i'll t
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Vignaud wrote:
...
> I was still testing on -rc2:
> Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
>
> For me after 1day 20hours, the network is still up, with more than 1To
> of n
> So, we still have to wait for the exact explanation...
>
> Thanks very much Marcin!
>
> I think, there is this one possible for your testing yet?:
> Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
>
> If it's not a great problem it w
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:33:27AM +0200, Marcin Ślusarz wrote:
> 2007/8/9, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
> > diff -Nurp 2.6.23-rc1-/kernel/irq/chip.c 2.6.23-rc1/kernel/irq/chip.c
> > --- 2.6.23-rc1-/kernel/irq/chip.c 2007-07-09 01:32:17.0 +0200
> > +++ 2.6.23-rc1/kernel/ir
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Read below please:
>
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:09:36PM +0200, Marcin Ślusarz wrote:
> > 2007/8/7, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > So, the let's try this idea yet: modified Ingo's "x86: activate
> > > HARDIRQS_SW_RESEN
12 matches
Mail list logo
