Re: [patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU

2017-04-20 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
On 04/19/2017 10:13 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 20:48 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> Hi Eric, >> >> [reodering for clarity] >> On 02/19/2017 09:55 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > [CC += Eric, so that he might review] > > Hello Francois, >>

Re: [patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU

2017-04-19 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 20:48 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Hi Eric, > > [reodering for clarity] > > >> On 02/19/2017 09:55 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > >>> [CC += Eric, so that he might review] > >>> > >>> Hello Francois, > >>> > >>> On 02/18/2017 05:06 AM, Francois Saint

Re: [patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU

2017-04-19 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Eric, [reodering for clarity] >> On 02/19/2017 09:55 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>> [CC += Eric, so that he might review] >>> >>> Hello Francois, >>> >>> On 02/18/2017 05:06 AM, Francois Saint-Jacques wrote: This socket option is undocumented. Applies on the latest version >>>

Re: [patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU

2017-04-19 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 15:20 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Ping Eric! > > Would you have a chance to review the proposed text below, please. > > Thanks, > Hi Michael Sorry for the delay. Note that setting the option is not supported if SO_REUSEPORT is used. Socket will be select

Re: [patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU

2017-04-19 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Ping Eric! Would you have a chance to review the proposed text below, please. Thanks, Michael On 02/19/2017 09:55 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > [CC += Eric, so that he might review] > > Hello Francois, > > On 02/18/2017 05:06 AM, Francois Saint-Jacques wrote: >> This socket option

Re: [patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU

2017-02-20 Thread Francois Saint-Jacques
> Because all of the packets for a single stream (i.e., all > packets for the same 4-tuple) arrive on the single RX queue This is a configuration dependent behaviour and not always the default. Maybe put a reference to `ethtool(8)` for more information instead of poss

Re: [patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU

2017-02-19 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[CC += Eric, so that he might review] Hello Francois, On 02/18/2017 05:06 AM, Francois Saint-Jacques wrote: > This socket option is undocumented. Applies on the latest version > (man-pages-4.09-511). > > diff --git a/man7/socket.7 b/man7/socket.7 > index 3efd7a5d8..1a3ffa253 100644 > --- a/man7/

[patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU

2017-02-17 Thread Francois Saint-Jacques
This socket option is undocumented. Applies on the latest version (man-pages-4.09-511). diff --git a/man7/socket.7 b/man7/socket.7 index 3efd7a5d8..1a3ffa253 100644 --- a/man7/socket.7 +++ b/man7/socket.7 @@ -490,6 +490,26 @@ flag on a socket operation. Expects an integer boolean flag. .TP +.BR