On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:04:31PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > I still have a patch in queue to improve usage of netif_carrier_{on,off}
> > but I had no possibility to test yet, so I did not send.
>
> I'd be happy to test it out if you'd like.
>
This would be great. I will rediff against ne
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:02:25PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 20:57 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > > Did you give the patch a try?
> > >
> > > Actually I have no possibility to test, but
> > > I think that netif_carrier_
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:02:25PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 20:57 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > Did you give the patch a try?
> >
> > Actually I have no possibility to test, but
> > I think that netif_carrier_{on,off} still does not
> > work proper. The timer functio
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 20:57 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> Did you give the patch a try?
>
> Actually I have no possibility to test, but
> I think that netif_carrier_{on,off} still does not
> work proper. The timer function does just nothing
> if vp->medialock is set.
>
Worked for me with 3c905
Did you give the patch a try?
Actually I have no possibility to test, but
I think that netif_carrier_{on,off} still does not
work proper. The timer function does just nothing
if vp->medialock is set.
Steffen
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:29:23PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch att
Hi,
This patch attempts to notice carrier 'on' state a little sooner. Since
the carrier watchdog only fires in really, really long intervals (like,
60s in most cases), it takes up to 60s to notice that a cable has been
plugged/unplugged. This patch fires the carrier watchdog if (1) the
carrier i
