RE: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather thand80211-specificqdisc

2006-11-03 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 11:23 -0800, Simon Barber wrote: > I would > think the master device is the perfect place to do packet capture, Sort of. Since it'll be an 802.11 protocol thing, you won't be getting any signal strength information etc. You really do need that. > and > raw packet transmissi

Re: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather thand80211-specificqdisc

2006-11-03 Thread John W. Linville
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:29:33AM -0800, Simon Barber wrote: > I should elaborate - if 802.11 is made into a real protocol - then raw > packet capture works correctly on the master device. (raw sockets opened > on the device see all frames before they are passed to the protocol). > This is the rig

RE: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather thand80211-specificqdisc

2006-11-03 Thread Simon Barber
pfifo_qdisc_ops rather thand80211-specificqdisc I'm not sure why we don't use the master device for packet capture - I can't think of any good reason for requiring a separate device. I would think the master device is the perfect place to do packet capture, and raw packet trans

RE: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather thand80211-specificqdisc

2006-11-03 Thread Simon Barber
: Johannes Berg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:57 PM To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Simon Barber; Christoph Hellwig; James Ketrenos; John W. Linville; Jeff Garzik; Patrick McHardy; David Kimdon; netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops ra