On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:19:01AM -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > + UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG= 128
> >
> >Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe
> >as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs...
>
> There's no reason not to make this tunable.
Roland Dreier wrote:
> + UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG= 128
Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe
as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs...
There's no reason not to make this tunable.
- Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev
> +UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG= 128
Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe
as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs...
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
> +struct ucma_file {
> +struct semaphoremutex;
This should be a struct mutex instead, I think.
> +static DECLARE_MUTEX(ctx_mutex);
Same here.
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo in
