On 08/10/2016 06:40 AM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:52:01PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:40:05PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:27:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:26:37PM -0700, Sargun
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:52:01PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:40:05PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:27:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:26:37PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 09,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:40:05PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:27:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:26:37PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:02:34PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 09,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:27:32PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:26:37PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:02:34PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:55:26PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 09,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:26:37PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:02:34PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:55:26PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:23:50PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 09,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:02:34PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:55:26PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:23:50PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:00:12PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > > > This adds a bpf
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:55:26PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:23:50PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:00:12PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > > This adds a bpf helper that's similar to the skb_in_cgroup helper to check
> > > whether th
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:23:50PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:00:12PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > This adds a bpf helper that's similar to the skb_in_cgroup helper to check
> > whether the probe is currently executing in the context of a specific
> > subset o
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:00:12PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> This adds a bpf helper that's similar to the skb_in_cgroup helper to check
> whether the probe is currently executing in the context of a specific
> subset of the cgroupsv2 hierarchy. It does this based on membership test
> for a cgr
This adds a bpf helper that's similar to the skb_in_cgroup helper to check
whether the probe is currently executing in the context of a specific
subset of the cgroupsv2 hierarchy. It does this based on membership test
for a cgroup arraymap. It is invalid to call this in an interrupt, and
it'll retu
10 matches
Mail list logo