On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:25:05 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
> On Tue 09 Feb 2021 at 21:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:17:11 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
> >> 4. Decapsulated payload appears on namespaced VF with IP address
> >> 5.5.5.5:
> >>
> >> $ sudo ip netns exec ns0 tcpdump -ni
On Wed 10 Feb 2021 at 15:56, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:10:59PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:26 PM Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> > On Mon 08 Feb 2021 at 22:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:21:21 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
>>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:10:59PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:26 PM Vlad Buslov wrote:
> > On Mon 08 Feb 2021 at 22:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:21:21 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
>
> > >> > These operations imply that 7.7.7.5 is configured on some i
On Tue 09 Feb 2021 at 21:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:17:11 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> 4. Decapsulated payload appears on namespaced VF with IP address
>> 5.5.5.5:
>>
>> $ sudo ip netns exec ns0 tcpdump -ni enp8s0f0v1 -vvv -c 3
>
> So there are two VFs? Hm, completely mis
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:17:11 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
> 4. Decapsulated payload appears on namespaced VF with IP address
> 5.5.5.5:
>
> $ sudo ip netns exec ns0 tcpdump -ni enp8s0f0v1 -vvv -c 3
So there are two VFs? Hm, completely missed that. Could you *please*
provide an ascii diagram for the e
On Tue 09 Feb 2021 at 20:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:22:26 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> No, tunnel IP is configured on VF. That particular VF is in host
>> namespace. When mlx5 resolves tunneling the code checks if tunnel
>> endpoint IP address is on such mlx5 VF, since the
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:22:26 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
> No, tunnel IP is configured on VF. That particular VF is in host
> namespace. When mlx5 resolves tunneling the code checks if tunnel
> endpoint IP address is on such mlx5 VF, since the VF is in same
> namespace as eswitch manager (e.g. on host)
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:26 PM Vlad Buslov wrote:
> On Mon 08 Feb 2021 at 22:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:21:21 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
> >> > These operations imply that 7.7.7.5 is configured on some interface on
> >> > the host. Most likely the VF representor itself, as
On Mon 08 Feb 2021 at 22:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:21:21 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> > These operations imply that 7.7.7.5 is configured on some interface on
>> > the host. Most likely the VF representor itself, as that aids with ARP
>> > resolution. Is that so?
>>
>> Hi M
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:02:24 -0800 you wrote:
> From: Mark Bloch
>
> Setting the source port requires only the E-Switch and vport number.
> Refactor the function to get those parameters instead of passing the full
> attr
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:21:21 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
> > These operations imply that 7.7.7.5 is configured on some interface on
> > the host. Most likely the VF representor itself, as that aids with ARP
> > resolution. Is that so?
>
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> The tunnel endpoint IP address is configured o
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 03:31:50PM +0200, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>
> On Mon 08 Feb 2021 at 15:25, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:21:21AM +0200, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat 06 Feb 2021 at 20:13, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I
On Mon 08 Feb 2021 at 15:25, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:21:21AM +0200, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>>
>> On Sat 06 Feb 2021 at 20:13, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I didn't receive the cover letter, so I'm replying on this one. :-)
>> >
>> > Thi
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:21:21AM +0200, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>
> On Sat 06 Feb 2021 at 20:13, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I didn't receive the cover letter, so I'm replying on this one. :-)
> >
> > This is nice. One thing is not clear to me yet. From the samples on
> > the c
On Sat 06 Feb 2021 at 20:13, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't receive the cover letter, so I'm replying on this one. :-)
>
> This is nice. One thing is not clear to me yet. From the samples on
> the cover letter:
>
> $ tc -s filter show dev enp8s0f0_1 ingress
> filter protocol
Hi,
I didn't receive the cover letter, so I'm replying on this one. :-)
This is nice. One thing is not clear to me yet. From the samples on
the cover letter:
$ tc -s filter show dev enp8s0f0_1 ingress
filter protocol ip pref 4 flower chain 0
filter protocol ip pref 4 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
From: Mark Bloch
Setting the source port requires only the E-Switch and vport number.
Refactor the function to get those parameters instead of passing the full
attribute.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch
Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed
---
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_of
17 matches
Mail list logo
