Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.

2017-01-06 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > On 1/5/2017 3:50 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > It looks like you are returning the VF port number as phys_port_name() for a > VF rep in en_rep.c. Is this correct? yeah, correct, what we all call the VF rep actually represents the eswitch vpo

Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.

2017-01-05 Thread Samudrala, Sridhar
On 1/5/2017 3:50 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: On 1/3/2017 3:03 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: On 12/30/2016 7:31 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: Are you exposing switchdev ops for the representato

Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.

2017-01-05 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > > > On 1/3/2017 3:03 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar >> wrote: >>> >>> On 12/30/2016 7:31 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: Are you exposing switchdev ops for the representators? didn't see

Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.

2017-01-04 Thread Samudrala, Sridhar
On 1/3/2017 3:03 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: On 12/30/2016 7:31 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: Are you exposing switchdev ops for the representators? didn't see that or maybe it's in the 4th patch which didn't make it to the list? Not at this time

Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.

2017-01-03 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > On 12/30/2016 7:31 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> Are you exposing switchdev ops for the representators? didn't see that >> or maybe it's in the 4th patch which didn't make it to the list? > Not at this time. In the future patches when we of

Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.

2016-12-30 Thread Samudrala, Sridhar
On 12/30/2016 7:31 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: In switchdev mode, broadcast filter is not enabled on VFs, The broadcasts and nit ", The broadcast" --> ", the broadcasts" or ". The broadcasts" unknown frames from VFs are received by the PF a

Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.

2016-12-30 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > In switchdev mode, broadcast filter is not enabled on VFs, The broadcasts and nit ", The broadcast" --> ", the broadcasts" or ". The broadcasts" > unknown frames from VFs are received by the PF and passed to corresponding VF > port repr

[net-next PATCH 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.

2016-12-29 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
In switchdev mode, broadcast filter is not enabled on VFs, The broadcasts and unknown frames from VFs are received by the PF and passed to corresponding VF port representator netdev. A host based switching entity like a linux bridge or OVS redirects these frames to the right VFs via VFPR netdevs. A