On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:54 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:44:59 -0800
>> The only countries you hold netdev are Canada, Japan and Spain
>> (to my knowledge). If you check:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_requirements_for_Chinese_citizens#Visa_req
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 21:08 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:44:59 -0800 Cong Wang
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> [...]
>> > > You can keep showing us how expertly yo
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 21:08 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:44:59 -0800 Cong Wang wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Miller wrote:
> [...]
> > > You can keep showing us how expertly you can deflect the real
> > > issue we are discussion here, but t
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 13:12 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:06:01 -0800
>
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Eric Dumazet
> >> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800
> >>
> >>> You really should come to netdev conferences
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:44:59 -0800 Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Miller wrote:
[...]
> > You can keep showing us how expertly you can deflect the real
> > issue we are discussion here, but that won't improve the situation
> > at all I am afraid.
>
> Of course, th
From: Cong Wang
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:44:59 -0800
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Miller wrote:
> Facepalm is heavily used on Internet:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facepalm#Internet_usage
>
> it is how people including me react to disappointing.
Everyone here, except you, bel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> Of course, there are just too many people too lazy to do a google search:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2013/05/msg00500.html
>
One more:
https://communities.intel.com/thread/28935 (<-- search icmp_send)
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:06:01 -0800
>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Eric Dumazet
>>> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800
>>>
You really should come to netdev conferences so tha
From: Cong Wang
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:06:01 -0800
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800
>>
>>> You really should come to netdev conferences so that you understand
>>> goals and efforts, instead of living in your
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800
>
>> You really should come to netdev conferences so that you understand
>> goals and efforts, instead of living in your cave.
>
> I completely agree with Eric.
>
> Cong we have a ver
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> We are in 2017. Whatever was said in 2013 is irrelevant.
>
> You really should come to netdev conferences so that you understand
> goals and efforts, instead of living in your cave.
>
> Then you can slap me in the face, since this is obviousl
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:52:59 -0500 (EST)
David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800
>
> > You really should come to netdev conferences so that you understand
> > goals and efforts, instead of living in your cave.
>
> I completely agree with Eric.
>
> C
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 10:07 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:59 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
[]
> > Facepalm...
[]
> We are in 2017. Whatever was said in 2013 is irrelevant.
Unless you morph into the PEOTUS, as a
general statement, this is untrue.
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800
> You really should come to netdev conferences so that you understand
> goals and efforts, instead of living in your cave.
I completely agree with Eric.
Cong we have a very serious problem with you exactly because you make
quite vicious e
From: Cong Wang
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:59:34 -0800
> Facepalm...
This is completely unnecessary. Discuss facts and real issues, rather
than make emotional retorts.
Thank you.
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:59 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:42 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> >> wrote:
> >> > This reverts commit 9a99d4a50cb8 ("icmp: avoid allocatin
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:42 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>> wrote:
>> > This reverts commit 9a99d4a50cb8 ("icmp: avoid allocating large struct
>> > on stack"), because struct icmp_bxm no rea
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:42 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> wrote:
> > This reverts commit 9a99d4a50cb8 ("icmp: avoid allocating large struct
> > on stack"), because struct icmp_bxm no really a large struct, and
> > allocating and free of this sma
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 16:04 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> This reverts commit 9a99d4a50cb8 ("icmp: avoid allocating large struct
> on stack"), because struct icmp_bxm no really a large struct, and
> allocating and free of this small 112 bytes hurts performance.
>
> Fixes: 9a99d4a50cb8 ("i
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
> This reverts commit 9a99d4a50cb8 ("icmp: avoid allocating large struct
> on stack"), because struct icmp_bxm no really a large struct, and
> allocating and free of this small 112 bytes hurts performance.
The original commit fixes a w
This reverts commit 9a99d4a50cb8 ("icmp: avoid allocating large struct
on stack"), because struct icmp_bxm no really a large struct, and
allocating and free of this small 112 bytes hurts performance.
Fixes: 9a99d4a50cb8 ("icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack")
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaar
21 matches
Mail list logo
