On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 19:05:20 +
> Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 17:01 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> > Only driver sfc actually uses this, but I don't have this NIC, so I
>> > tested this on mlx5, wit
On 07/13/2018 07:19 AM, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 12/07/18 21:10, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>> wrote:
>>> One reason I didn't "just" send a patch, is that Edward so-fare only
>>> implemented netif_receive_skb_list() and not napi_gro_receive_list
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 15:19:40 +0100
Edward Cree wrote:
> On 12/07/18 21:10, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> > wrote:
> >> One reason I didn't "just" send a patch, is that Edward so-fare only
> >> implemented netif_receive_skb_list() and not napi_
On 12/07/18 21:10, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> wrote:
>> One reason I didn't "just" send a patch, is that Edward so-fare only
>> implemented netif_receive_skb_list() and not napi_gro_receive_list().
> sfc does't support gro?! doesn't make sense..
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:10:28 +0300 Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> wrote:
>
> > Well, I would prefer you to implement those. I just did a quick
> > implementation (its trivially easy) so I have something to benchmark
> > with. The performance boo
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:01:20 +0200
> In commit 5fa12739a53d ("net: ipv4: listify ip_rcv_finish") calling
> dst_input(skb) was split-out. The ip_sublist_rcv_finish() just calls
> dst_input(skb) in a loop.
>
> The problem is that ip_sublist_rcv_finish() forgot to r
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
> Well, I would prefer you to implement those. I just did a quick
> implementation (its trivially easy) so I have something to benchmark
> with. The performance boost is quite impressive!
sounds good, but wait
> One reason I did
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:41:35 +0100
Edward Cree wrote:
> On 11/07/18 16:01, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > In commit 5fa12739a53d ("net: ipv4: listify ip_rcv_finish") calling
> > dst_input(skb) was split-out. The ip_sublist_rcv_finish() just calls
> > dst_input(skb) in a loop.
> >
> > The prob
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 19:05:20 +
Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 17:01 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Only driver sfc actually uses this, but I don't have this NIC, so I
> > tested this on mlx5, with my own changes to make it use
> > netif_receive_skb_list(),
> > but I'm
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 17:01 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Only driver sfc actually uses this, but I don't have this NIC, so I
> tested this on mlx5, with my own changes to make it use
> netif_receive_skb_list(),
> but I'm not ready to upstream the mlx5 driver change yet.
Thanks Jesper fo
On 11/07/18 16:01, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> In commit 5fa12739a53d ("net: ipv4: listify ip_rcv_finish") calling
> dst_input(skb) was split-out. The ip_sublist_rcv_finish() just calls
> dst_input(skb) in a loop.
>
> The problem is that ip_sublist_rcv_finish() forgot to remove the SKB
> from
In commit 5fa12739a53d ("net: ipv4: listify ip_rcv_finish") calling
dst_input(skb) was split-out. The ip_sublist_rcv_finish() just calls
dst_input(skb) in a loop.
The problem is that ip_sublist_rcv_finish() forgot to remove the SKB
from the list before invoking dst_input(). Further more we need
12 matches
Mail list logo
