On 05/18/2018 01:28 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 05/18/2018 02:37 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>
>> * parallelized this function, so drop lock for the
>>>
>>> Parallelizing? Else the sentence doesn't parse for me. :-)
>
>My comment hardly makes sense when you removed all the conte
On 05/18/2018 02:37 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> * parallelized this function, so drop lock for the
>>
>> Parallelizing? Else the sentence doesn't parse for me. :-)
My comment hardly makes sense when you removed all the context...
> Hi Sergei,
>
> In a separate series I parallelized
* parallelized this function, so drop lock for the
>
> Parallelizing? Else the sentence doesn't parse for me. :-)
Hi Sergei,
In a separate series I parallelized device_shutdown(), see:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180516024004.28977-1-pasha.tatas...@oracle.com
But, this particular patch
Hello!
On 5/17/2018 7:37 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
From: Pavel Tatashin
Currently, during device_shutdown() ixgbe holds rtnl_lock for the duration
of lengthy ixgbe_close_suspend(). On machines with multiple ixgbe cards
this lock prevents scaling if device_shutdown() function is multi-threaded.
From: Pavel Tatashin
Currently, during device_shutdown() ixgbe holds rtnl_lock for the duration
of lengthy ixgbe_close_suspend(). On machines with multiple ixgbe cards
this lock prevents scaling if device_shutdown() function is multi-threaded.
It is not necessary to hold this lock during ixgbe_c
