On 8/3/2020 4:54 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 8/3/20 5:30 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>
>> Slightly unrelated: but the recent change to using a bitfield32 results
>> in a "GENMASK is undefined".. I'm not sure what the proper way to fix
>> this is, since we'd like to still use GENMASK to define the s
On 8/3/20 5:30 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>
> Slightly unrelated: but the recent change to using a bitfield32 results
> in a "GENMASK is undefined".. I'm not sure what the proper way to fix
> this is, since we'd like to still use GENMASK to define the supported
> bitfields. I guess we need to pull in
On 8/3/2020 8:53 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/31/20 6:21 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> Add support for specifying the overwrite sections to allow in the flash
>> update command. This is done by adding a new "overwrite" option which
>> can take either "settings" or "identifiers" passing the overwri
On 8/3/2020 2:20 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 8/3/20 10:56 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> Sorry for the confusion here. I sent both the iproute2 and net-next
>> changes to implement it in the kernel.
>
> please re-send the iproute2 patch; I already marked it in patchworks. I
> get sending the patche
On 8/3/20 10:56 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion here. I sent both the iproute2 and net-next
> changes to implement it in the kernel.
please re-send the iproute2 patch; I already marked it in patchworks. I
get sending the patches in 1 go, but kernel and iproute2 patch numbering
sh
On 8/3/2020 8:53 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/31/20 6:21 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> Add support for specifying the overwrite sections to allow in the flash
>> update command. This is done by adding a new "overwrite" option which
>> can take either "settings" or "identifiers" passing the overwri
Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 05:53:16PM CEST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 7/31/20 6:21 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> Add support for specifying the overwrite sections to allow in the flash
>> update command. This is done by adding a new "overwrite" option which
>> can take either "settings" or "identifiers"
On 7/31/20 6:21 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Add support for specifying the overwrite sections to allow in the flash
> update command. This is done by adding a new "overwrite" option which
> can take either "settings" or "identifiers" passing the overwrite mode
> multiple times will combine the fields
Add support for specifying the overwrite sections to allow in the flash
update command. This is done by adding a new "overwrite" option which
can take either "settings" or "identifiers" passing the overwrite mode
multiple times will combine the fields using bitwise-OR.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller
