On 11/26/2018 8:02 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:56:10 -0800
> "Nambiar, Amritha" wrote:
>
>> On 11/26/2018 4:43 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 11/26/18 5:23 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
> Can tc flower use something similar to ip ru with single port or port
> rang
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:56:10 -0800
"Nambiar, Amritha" wrote:
> On 11/26/2018 4:43 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> > On 11/26/18 5:23 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
> >>> Can tc flower use something similar to ip ru with single port or port
> >>> range handled like this?
> >>>
> >>> },{
> >>>
On 11/26/2018 4:43 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/26/18 5:23 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>>> Can tc flower use something similar to ip ru with single port or port
>>> range handled like this?
>>>
>>> },{
>>> "priority": 32764,
>>> "src": "172.16.1.0",
>>> "srclen": 24,
>
On 11/26/18 5:23 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> Can tc flower use something similar to ip ru with single port or port
>> range handled like this?
>>
>> },{
>> "priority": 32764,
>> "src": "172.16.1.0",
>> "srclen": 24,
>> "ipproto": "tcp",
>> "sport": 110
On 11/21/2018 1:42 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/20/18 11:17 PM, Amritha Nambiar wrote:
>> diff --git a/tc/f_flower.c b/tc/f_flower.c
>> index 65fca04..722647d 100644
>> --- a/tc/f_flower.c
>> +++ b/tc/f_flower.c
>> @@ -494,6 +494,68 @@ static int flower_parse_port(char *str, __u8 ip_proto,
>>
On 11/20/18 11:17 PM, Amritha Nambiar wrote:
> diff --git a/tc/f_flower.c b/tc/f_flower.c
> index 65fca04..722647d 100644
> --- a/tc/f_flower.c
> +++ b/tc/f_flower.c
> @@ -494,6 +494,68 @@ static int flower_parse_port(char *str, __u8 ip_proto,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int flower_port_ra
Added support for filtering based on port ranges.
UAPI changes have been accepted into net-next.
Example:
1. Match on a port range:
-
$ tc filter add dev enp4s0 protocol ip parent :\
prio 1 flower ip_proto tcp dst_port range 20-30 skip_hw\
action drop
$ tc -s filte
