Re: [iproute PATCH 00/51] Fix potential issues detected by Coverity tool

2017-08-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:04:32 +0200 Phil Sutter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:07:25AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:04:19 +0200 > > Phil Sutter wrote: > > > > > Covscan really wasn't amused (indicated by the number of patches in this > > > series). Try to mak

Re: [iproute PATCH 00/51] Fix potential issues detected by Coverity tool

2017-08-15 Thread Phil Sutter
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:07:25AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:04:19 +0200 > Phil Sutter wrote: > > > Covscan really wasn't amused (indicated by the number of patches in this > > series). Try to make it happy. > > > > Phil Sutter (51): [...] > > 40 files changed, 23

Re: [iproute PATCH 00/51] Fix potential issues detected by Coverity tool

2017-08-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:04:19 +0200 Phil Sutter wrote: > Covscan really wasn't amused (indicated by the number of patches in this > series). Try to make it happy. > > Phil Sutter (51): > devlink: Check return code of strslashrsplit() > devlink: No need for this self-assignment > ipaddress:

[iproute PATCH 00/51] Fix potential issues detected by Coverity tool

2017-08-12 Thread Phil Sutter
Covscan really wasn't amused (indicated by the number of patches in this series). Try to make it happy. Phil Sutter (51): devlink: Check return code of strslashrsplit() devlink: No need for this self-assignment ipaddress: Make buffer for filter.flushb static ipaddress: Avoid accessing unin