On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:57:46AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 03:35:53PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 18:57:28 +
> > Phil Sutter wrote:
> >
> > > There have been reports about 'ip addr' printing "Message truncated" on
> > > systems with large
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 15:35 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > There have been reports about 'ip addr' printing "Message
> > truncated" on
[...]
> I thought this was addressed in kernel by making the VF info
> optional.
> The netlink protocol is showing some strain, this is one of them.
I don'
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 03:35:53PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 18:57:28 +
> Phil Sutter wrote:
>
> > There have been reports about 'ip addr' printing "Message truncated" on
> > systems with large numbers of VFs. Although I haven't been able to get
> > my hands on hard
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 18:57:28 +
Phil Sutter wrote:
> There have been reports about 'ip addr' printing "Message truncated" on
> systems with large numbers of VFs. Although I haven't been able to get
> my hands on hardware suitable to reproduce this, increasing the dump
> buffer has been reported
There have been reports about 'ip addr' printing "Message truncated" on
systems with large numbers of VFs. Although I haven't been able to get
my hands on hardware suitable to reproduce this, increasing the dump
buffer has been reported to resolve the issue. For want of a better
idea, just double t