On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:58:30 -0700
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> We also care about icache pressure, and GRO/TSO already provides
> bundling where it is applicable, without adding insane complexity in
> the stacks.
Sorry, I cannot resist. The GRO code is really bad regarding icache
pressure/usage, due t
On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 16:20 +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 12/09/16 11:15, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > I'm reacting so loudly, because this is a mental model switch, that
> > need to be applied to the full drivers RX path. Also for normal stack
> > delivery of SKBs. As both Edward Cree[1] and
On 12/09/16 11:15, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> I'm reacting so loudly, because this is a mental model switch, that
> need to be applied to the full drivers RX path. Also for normal stack
> delivery of SKBs. As both Edward Cree[1] and I[2] have demonstrated,
> there is between 10%-25% perf gain
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:03:09 +0300
> Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Alexei Starovoitov via iovisor-dev
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:03:09 +0300
Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Alexei Starovoitov via iovisor-dev
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm sorry but I have a problem with this patch!
> >> Looking at this pat
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Alexei Starovoitov via iovisor-dev
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>
>> I'm sorry but I have a problem with this patch!
>
> is it because the variable is called 'xdp_doorbell'?
> Frankly I see nothing scary in this p
