On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 16:19 -0700, David Decotigny wrote:
> will send a v5 shortly without this patch: question below.
>
> about this patch: this is in prevision of a world where INET can be
> compiled out. So it is not something that matters today with current
> kernels.
OK.
> Now, as you menti
will send a v5 shortly without this patch: question below.
about this patch: this is in prevision of a world where INET can be
compiled out. So it is not something that matters today with current
kernels.
Now, as you mentioned in another patch, the only socket that survives
various reasonable CON
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 09:58 -0800, David Decotigny wrote:
> From: David Decotigny
>
>
> Signed-off-by: David Decotigny
> ---
> ethtool.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ethtool.c b/ethtool.c
> index 761252f..f9336e3 100644
> --- a/ethtool.c
> +++ b/ethtool.c
> @@ -
From: David Decotigny
Signed-off-by: David Decotigny
---
ethtool.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ethtool.c b/ethtool.c
index 761252f..f9336e3 100644
--- a/ethtool.c
+++ b/ethtool.c
@@ -4615,6 +4615,9 @@ opt_found:
/* Open control socket. */
From: David Decotigny
Signed-off-by: David Decotigny
---
ethtool.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ethtool.c b/ethtool.c
index 761252f..f9336e3 100644
--- a/ethtool.c
+++ b/ethtool.c
@@ -4615,6 +4615,9 @@ opt_found:
/* Open control socket. */
