On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 17:30 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> Patch 11: you need to answer my question about this.
[This is about why/whether there should be a fallback from creating an
AF_INET socket to issue SIOCETHTOOL on.]
I looked a little further, and found:
- The only address/protocol fa
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 09:58 -0800, David Decotigny wrote:
> From: David Decotigny
>
> This adds support for the new ETHTOOL_xLINKSETTINGS ioctls. This also
> fixes a few compilation warnings as well as a heap corruption bug.
[...]
Patches 1-7: applied, thanks.
Patch 8: this breaks builds from t
From: David Decotigny
This adds support for the new ETHTOOL_xLINKSETTINGS ioctls. This also
fixes a few compilation warnings as well as a heap corruption bug.
History:
v4
review Ben Hutchings:
using AF_UNIX instead of INET6 in the absence of v4 sockets
use stdbool.h
do_se
From: David Decotigny
This adds support for the new ETHTOOL_xLINKSETTINGS ioctls. This also
fixes a few compilation warnings as well as a heap corruption bug.
History:
v4
review Ben Hutchings:
using AF_UNIX instead of INET6 in the absence of v4 sockets
use stdbool.h
do_se
