On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:55:56PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> Hm, I was wondering if there's a nicer way of getting the same result.
> Does it need to be done that way?
Actually you could use the skb->cb buffer which can store anything and
doesn't need to be cleaned up.
Cheers,
--
V
Herbert Xu wrote:
> I've had a look at now and you can just stuff it into one of the other
> pointers that's still there. We just need to make sure that it is
> reset properly before we feed the packet into the stack. The pointer
> skb->dev is one candidate but there are plenty of others.
>
H
