From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:16:38 +0100
> David S. Miller wrote:
> > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > I think this is -stable material, agreed?
>
> It was only introduced recently by the "[IPSEC]: Fix strange IPsec
> freeze." patch.
Ok, thanks for the clarificati
David S. Miller wrote:
> Applied, thanks.
>
> I think this is -stable material, agreed?
It was only introduced recently by the "[IPSEC]: Fix strange IPsec
freeze." patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordo
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:00:03 +0100
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:13:03AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >
> >>[XFRM]: Fix policy double put
> >>
> >>The policy is put once immediately and once at the error label, which
> >>result
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:13:03AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>[XFRM]: Fix policy double put
>>
>>The policy is put once immediately and once at the error label, which results
>>in the following Oops:
>
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks for catching this Patrick.
It caught
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:13:03AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> [XFRM]: Fix policy double put
>
> The policy is put once immediately and once at the error label, which results
> in the following Oops:
Looks good to me. Thanks for catching this Patrick.
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.open
[XFRM]: Fix policy double put
The policy is put once immediately and once at the error label, which results
in the following Oops:
kernel BUG at net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:250!
invalid opcode: [#2]
PREEMPT
[...]
CPU:0
EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00210246 (2.6.16-rc3 #39)
EI
